The Road Roller of Bihar
While
building a road in Bihar, in the early nineteenth century, the supervisor of the
construction project noticed that the road-roller seemed to be narrower at one
end and broader at the other. On closer inspection, he found some inscriptions
on its side, which that Brahmin pandit of the nearby village was unable to
read. He could not even identify the script (which he called the pin-men
script) or the language of the inscription. It seemed to be a pillar from some
monument. The road workers told the supervisor that the pillar had a lion
capital, which they cut off, so the pillar could be more useful as a
road-roller. Such was the fate Samrat Asoka’s pillar!
The road
supervisor was James Prinsep, who discovered that the language was Pali, the
script Brahmi,the capital destined to become India’s national emblem, the the
king and his dynasty forgotten, by a country with teeming not just with
history, but with people who cared not a whit about it. Ironically, most of us
schooled in independent India are now familiar with Asoka and his pillar and
utterly ignorant of Prinsep.
When
Prinsep stumbled upon the pillar, he was a member of the Asiatic Society of
Bengal, which had been founded in 1784 by Sir William “Oriental” Jones, a
polymath of tremendous accomplishment, to whose contribution to India was
immense, and who is almost as spectacularly forgotten as Prinsep.
Jones & the Asiatic Society
of Bengal
The East
India company and later, the British government, were the funnels through which
India was enriched by Western science and industrialization. The Asiatic Society was the funnel through which new fields in the humanities, like
Geology, Numismatics, Archaeology, Anthropology, Economics, Art History, all
recently evolving in Europe, enriched India. Jones, a child prodigy, master of
28 languages, and scholar of law, was appointed as a Puisne Judge of the
Calcutta Supreme Court in 1783. He formulated an agenda to study the law,
sciences, mathematics, history, geography, medicine, trade, manufacture,
agriculture and religions of not just India, but all of Asia. He surmounted
obstacles to quickly learn Sanskrit, and found such a similarity between it,
Persian, Latin and Greek, that he proposed that they all had a common ancestry.
His oft
quoted passage from his third lecture is : “The Sanskrit language, whatever its
antiquity is of a perfect structure, more
perfect than the Greek, more
copious than Latin, more
exquisitely refined than either, yet
bearing to both a stronger affinity, in
roots of verbs and forms of grammar, than
can have possibly been produced by accident. So strong that they…must have some common
source…reason to believe Celtic, Gothic, old Persian also had the same origin
as Sanskrit.” This
heralds the beginning of Modern Linguistics and the discovery of the
Indo-European Language Family.
Jones
went on to translate the Manu Smriti to English to better administer justice.
He also translated Kalidasa’s plays like Abinjana Shakuntalam, which took
Europe by storm. He discovered that Chess and Algebra had Indian origins, wrote
a treatise on Music, and studying Greek and Indian history, proposed that
Sandrocottus mentioned by Megasthenes was Chandragupta. On further study, he
also established the river Erranaboas was the Sone (originally called
Hiranyabahu) and that Chandragupta last capital Palibothra must have been
Pataliputra, now Patna, in Bihar (overturning Prayag, Kannauj, Varanasi etc as
candidates). Jones also told a thrilled Europe that India had an ancient God
called Buddha, perhaps of African origin, who founded a religion called Buddhism
in India,now forgotten. Europe soon discovered that Buddhism was alive and well
in the rest of Asia, but Jones’ discoveries launched an earnest inquiry into
India and Asia’s history, that primarily relied on literature for the next
three decades.
James Prinsep
And then
James Prinsep arrived in Calcutta in 1819. A prodigy very different from Jones,
with far humbler origins and far less accomplished youth, Prinsep nevertheless
made dramatic impacts on the Asiatic Society and scholarship. After working in
mints and civil administration, he turned to history in 1832. He transformed
the field from ‘scholastic archaeologists’ to ‘field archaeologists’ or
‘travelling antiquarians.’ His intellectual successor Alexander Cunningham said
of Prinsep, that between 1833 and 1838, “more of India’s history was reconstructed
than before or since.”
The
Society faced bankruptcy and a shutdown by Macaulay and Mill, who called
Oriental studies “waste paper and accumulation of timber.” But Governor General
Auckland restored its funding.
Coins and PinMen
An army
of Orientalist coin collectors, including Horace Wilson, Col James Tod, Charles
Masson, General Ventura, helped unravel several aspects of history. Masson
collected thirty thousand coins, which brought to light a number of Indo-Greek
kings from Theodotus (225 BC), Apollodorus, Menander, Eucradites, Antialkides,
Agathocles and Kanerkos (who was later identified as Kanishka by Prinsep). Some
of these like the coins of Agathocles had legends in both Greek and Sanskrit
(Rajane Agathakulasya). The Sanskrit script was the same as the pin-men script,
in Prinsep’s road roller.
Several
other pillars including the famous Feroz Lat in Delhi, Lauriya Nandangarh in
Bihar and in Allahabad had been discovered, with the same pin-men script. The
Allahabad pillar, for example, also had two other inscriptions, one of
Samudragupta in Sanskrit in Nagari script and Jehangir in Persian. Comparing
transcripts Prinsep realized that all three pillars had the same text, not just
the same script! The script had also been found at slabs in Bodh Gaya; a stupa
at Sanchi; and at Dhauli and at Udayagiri-Khondagiri, both near Bhubaneshvar.
The Samudragupta, son of Chandragupta of the Allahabad pillar was of the Solar
race, whereas William Jones’ Sandrocottus was of the Lunar race.
Rock with Asoka's Pali edict in Brahmi script at Dhauli, Orissa |
Brahmi inscription at Karla caves, Maharashtra Lower line reads "daanam" ( दानं ) |
Studying
the Sanchi inscriptions, Prinsep observed that several of them ended in the
same set of three characters. He brilliantly guessed that they were records of
donations, based on similar later inscriptions at other stupas in Buddhist
nations. Perhaps they were the phrase “-ssa daanam.” (-’s donation). Now he was
confident that the language was Pali, not Sanskrit. With
intelligent guessing, and dedicated effort, he decoded the script in six weeks! The Brahmi script was now
readable, nearly 1500 years after it had been replaced by its daughter script
Nagari.
Most of
the pin-men (Brahmi) inscriptions began with the phrase “Devaanaampiya
PiyaDassi laaja hevam
aaha” (“Thus spake King Beloved-of-the-Gods PiyaDassi”), but, who was this king? That continued to be a puzzle. There seemed to be no PiyaDassi in Indian literature.
Concurrently, Turnour, an Orientalist in Kandy was given a copy of the Mahavamsa, the History of Sri Lanka, by the Thero of the Saffragam monastery. He came across this passage : “King Devenampiya Tissa, induced Dammasoka, Ruler of several kingdoms of Dambadiva (Jambudvipa) to depute his son Mahindu and daughter Sangamitta to Auradhapura to introduce religion of Buddha.”
The Thero also gave Turnour the Dipavamso, which threw a flood of light : “218 years after MahaParinnirvana of Buddha, Piyadassi, son of Bindusara and grandson of Chandragupta, Viceroy of Ujjaiyini was inaugurated king.”
Thus,
Devanampiya Piyadassi was revealed to be Dammasoka or Dharma Asoka, grandson of
Chandragupta Maurya. The wide spread of his pillars and edicts, from
Afghanistan to Andhra Pradesh, showed how vast an empire he ruled; it gave
details of the Kalinga war, and of Asoka’s change of heart; and of his sending
emissaries to spread Buddhism across the world.
Consequences
Inscriptions
of the period 300 BC to 300 AD turned out to be in the Brahmi script, in Prakrit
or Sanskrit, and so, suddenly, six hundred years of history stood revealed,
including the dynasties of the Kshatrapas, the Kushanas, the Shungas, the
Satavahanas. The Hathigumpha inscriptions were of king Kharavela of the
Mahameghavahana dynasty.
In the
twentieth century, Tamil inscriptions in the Tamil Brahmi script were also
discovered. The field of palaeography was enriched when it was realized that
the Brahmi script is the parent script of both Nagari and Grantham scripts, the
latter of which was the parent of scripts of the South East Asian languages
like Thai, Burmese, Sumatran, Cambodian etc.
References
1. Buddha and the Sahibs by Charles Allen
2. The Asiatic Society of Bengal by O.P. Kejriwal
3. The Powerpoint presentations of S Swaminathan
4. Essays by James Prinsep, Journal of the Asiatic Society
Video of INTACT lecture Rediscovery of Asoka - lecture in 2013
Audio of 2016 DUJ Lecture on Rediscovery of Brahmi and Asoka - Part 1
Audio of 2016 DUJ Lecture on Rediscovery of Brahmi and Asoka - Part 2
My blogs on Western Orientalists
1. Ellenborough - Abolition of slavery in India
2. Robert Caldwell - discoverer of Munda language family
3. Francis Whyte Ellis - discoverer of Dravidian language family
4. An Englishman's Tamil inscription
5. A mathematician's Poem about Madras
6. Did Macaulay undermine Indian education?
7. Madras and its American connections
My History blogs
Three Perspectives on History - Caldwell, Mark Twain, PT Srinivasa Iyengar
Novel on Samrat Asoka - some speeches
Timelines of Gujarat and Tamilnadu
Timelines of Karnataka and Tamilnadu
Vaishali
Origins of Chemistry
Beginning of Electronics
"The Asiatic Society was the funnel through which new fields in the humanities, like Geology, Numismatics, Archaeology, Anthropology, Economics, Art History, all recently evolving in Europe, enriched India."
ReplyDeleteWell-put.
Starting with a road-roller at a construction site supervised by Prinsep, the one who reconstructed our history like never before or after in his tenure as a member of the Asiatic Society founded by Willian Jones, who's instrumental in studying this region more wisely than we ourselves did at the time, and being a bridge between Europe and India with the linguistics and other literature. Prinsep and others then further study coins/inscriptions and recreate history of both Gupta and Maurya dynasties to finally reveal the identity of Devanampiya Piyadassi, our own Ashoka!
The storyteller that you are! :)