மாமல்லபுரத்து உழைப்பாளர் சிலை (Tamil version of this essay)
There is a statue called Triumph of Labour, opposite to the
Senate Building of the Madras university and adjacent to the MGR and Jayalalitha
graves at the Marina beach in Madras. This was designed by Roy Chowdhry, a
former Principal of the Government College of Fine Arts, Egmore. The college is
only a couple of miles away from the statue.
It depicts four people straining their sinews in hard
physical labour, trying to move a large boulder with a long rod. It was not only
art, but a political statement, a celebration of Marxism and democracy. a
tribute to the Labour movement of the early twentieth century.
Labour Statue, Marina beach, Madras |
There are several other statues in the Marina beach, mostly
commissioned and installed to mark the World Tamil Conference held in 1968. The
previous year 1967, the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam won elections and formed the
government. These statues are celebration of Tamil literature, culture and the Dravidian
movement, an alternate to the Congress and the Communist parties that were
popular until then in Tamilnadu. Hence there are statues to ancient poets
Tiruvalluvar, Ilango and Avvaiyar,
modern poets Subramania Bharati and Bhaaratidaasan, and Kannagi, the heroine of
the Ilango’s great epic Silappadikaaram.
A statue for the medieval Tamil poet Kamban was added in 1971.
Three foreigners
who enriched Tamil literature were also
honored with statues. They are : Italian priest Constantine Beschi (who
called himself Veeramaamunivar in Tamil and wrote the story of Jesus Christ as
the Tamil epic Tembaavani,), English
Bishop Robert Caldwell, then considered the discoverer of the Dravidian
language family, and GU Pope, who translated Tirukkural and Tiruvaasagam
into English.
Before the era of British rule in India, statues in public
were rare. There are no mentions of such statues in literature and no archaeological
evidence. After India became independent, Indians adopted the British custom
and festooned the country with statues of politicians in practically every
street. In Madras, there are also statues to poets, authors and cinema actors.
While most of these other statues in Chennai may not excite connoisseurs or critics of art, the Labour statue is quite noteworthy. But rarely do visitors come to see this statue for its artistic merit. It is simply something else to on their way to the beach. People who visit Madras to see sculptures visit either the Egmore museum or Mamallapuram.
While most of these other statues in Chennai may not excite connoisseurs or critics of art, the Labour statue is quite noteworthy. But rarely do visitors come to see this statue for its artistic merit. It is simply something else to on their way to the beach. People who visit Madras to see sculptures visit either the Egmore museum or Mamallapuram.
Art Galleries
Temples are the galleries of art of India, for painting sculpture
or architecture. They are the monuments which are renovated least and hence
offer the best snapshots of the past. Parthasarathy temple in Tiruvallikkeni is
perhaps the temple in Chennai with oldest sculptures, of the Vijayanagar
period.
Art historians consider Mamallapuram the cradle of Dravidian
architecture and sculpture. (Here Dravidian refers to a style of sculpture as
per the Hindu shilpa shaastras, not the language family or the political
movement). Some of Mahendra Pallava’s caves precede Mamallapuram, but have few
sculptures, all of Gods or dvarapalakas. Few people visit them. From the
Pallava era, and even earlier, till now, temples are the primary art galleries
of not just Tamil country, but also India. Several historians and scholars, primarily
Marxists but also quite a few others, inject political and social perspectives
to temples and sculptures, but the fundamental intention of temples continues
to be religion. The art serves the religion.
In the centuries that followed
Mamallapuram, when temples in granite proliferated the Tamil country, the
sculptures of the Pallavas, Pandyas, Cholas or their feudatories, all depicted
episodes from the itihaasas Ramayana and Mahabharata, the Puranas or the episodes
from the lives of the Alwaars or Naayanmaars. Only from the Vijayanagar era,
ordinary people, kuravan kuratti, scenes of daily life etc started to
proliferate.
But Mamallapuram is an exception.
The Worker Sculptures of Mamallapuram
The Great Penance panel in Mamallapuram or Mallai, depicts
either Arjuna or Bhagiratha in penance, as Siva appears to grant his book.
Devas, Gandharvas, Rishis, Vidyadharas, Kinnaras, Kimpurushas, flock to see
this marvelous sight. A number of birds and animals are also featured in the
magnificent spectacle. Among these are four hunters, or kiraatas. Kiraataarjuniyam was a great Sanskrit
epic, composed by Bharavi around this time. Siva disguised as a kiraata arrives
to test Arjuna : the test turns into a war first of words, then arrows, then
hand to hand combat. The Penance panel doesn’t feature Siva as a kiraata, but
the four kiraatas in the sculpture may indicate this episode. They all carry tall
bows, but none bears the carcass of a hunted animal. One carries a jackfruit.
Great Penance panel - Mamallapuram |
They are not gods, or royalty or landed gentry, but daily
toilers. They are not shown lifting or moving something heavy, straining their muscles,
suffering from the heat of the midday sun, or sweating profusely. They are working
for themselves, not being exploited by a moneyed class. Nothing for a Marxist
to criticize, an union leader to organize, a writer or artist to lament, or a
social justice warrior to exploit. There maybe some scope for an anthropologist
or an art critic, but they generally seem to have ignored such sculptures.
Kiratas in the Great Penance |
A curious aspect is their neutral expression – there is none
of the vismaya of the celestials, the languidness of the animals at rest, or
the delight of the elephants charging towards the water.
A stone’s throw from the Penance panel is the Govardhana
Panel. Krishna lifts the mountain with his hand, with Balarama Subhadra and a
host of the Yadavas and their cattle all taking refuge under it. The most remarkable
aspect here is the utter normality of village life while a storm rages all
around. Here a cowherd milks a cow, a lady vends her buttermilk, another
carries a pile of straw on her head, a man plays the flute, his wife warns him
that it is disturbing the sleeping baby, and so on. All people at work; but the
primary intent of the sculptor is show the Grand Deed of Krishna, not the toil
of the workers.
center: Krishna lifting Govardha right : Lady carrying pots with buttermilk |
right: Yaadava milking cow left: Lady carrying straw |
The Dharamaraja ratha, tallest of the Five Rathas, features several
marvelous sculptures in the second and third floor, mostly of Siva and some of
Vishnu, and their devotees. Among these are five temple workers – a priest
(archaka), an attendant with a bell in his hand (parichaaraka), a cook
(svayampaka), a water bearer (a lady with a pot) and a musician (oduvaar). Four
of these are on the eastern wall, the lady with the pot is in the western wall.
As temples became bigger, they acquired a larger band of workers, but none of the
later Pallava or Chola temples ever depicts a single such worker.
In some temples of the Nayak era, sculptures of kings,
queens, ministers, generals and donors are etched on some pillars. But in the
ancient and medieval era, not a single poet, administrator, artist, architect,
businessman, scientist, scholar, were apparently considered fit to commemorate
with statues in temples. We have no idea what Kamaban Tiruvalluvar Ilango Avvaiyaar
and others looked like. We don’t even know the names of the sthapathis and
silpis of most of the temples, leave alone portrait sculptures. Perhaps some
were featured in paintings in palaces or palm leaf manuscripts or other forms
of painting, now lost.
In this respect, the statues of the workers, commoners as
depicted in Mamallapuram remain unique.
If you liked this essay, check out other such essays by me
If you liked this essay, check out other such essays by me
Nice details which we often tend to be indifferent to, when we go to watch temple architecture.
ReplyDeleteWe look for grandeur and aesthetics, we delight in the stories that we are able to identify in the sculptures e.g. the act of lifting Govardhana giri, but pay less attention to the rest of the details that make those acts complete or are crucial in recreating those times for us. That's my takeaway here - not to ignore anything.