Showing posts with label China. Show all posts
Showing posts with label China. Show all posts

Tuesday, 28 July 2020

A Texas table tennis story


In my childhood, I lived on the same street as Ramanathan “Tennis” Krishnan, and his son Ramesh Krishnan, in CIT Colony. He was the big national celebrity of the colony. The sports I played as a kid were Hide and Seek, its variation Ice Boys, spinning tops, seven stones, and of course street cricket with worn out tennis balls. We had a large open ground across our house, which has since become a park, and we played cricket there in the evenings. Tennis was the game of rich people who could afford a place to play. Tennis was the game of rich people who could afford a place to play.  Our highest ambition then was to one day play cricket with a fresh tennis ball, rather than a ball which was no longer fit for tennis.

Television had recently arrived. My neighbors bought a black and white TV, and for some months I watched cricket, whose rules I knew, and suddenly one day, tennis! Something called Wimbledon and somebody called Bjorn Borg of Sweden played John McEnroe of USA. For the first time, I watched two entire sets played, not just a three second glance of Tennis Krishnan’s court as we passed by in a bus. When we caught Wimbledon fever, my neighbor Sridhar and I marked our cement courtyard with a brick, and played tennis with our bare palms.

One day I found there was another sport which was almost as much a rich man’s game – table tennis. Instead of a lawn, you needed a table, and used very small rackets and a really tiny ball. This too I saw on television. Nobody I knew had a table, and we didn’t have one at school, and cricket kept me happy, so I didn’t think much of table tennis, except that I probably wont be very good at it. After al, I was less than mediocre at cricket, even though I loved playing.

Several years later, I went to college. The hostelites demanded a table tennis, and the management bought one and few bats and balls too! It was kept in the mess, half of which had dining tables, the other mostly open, except for the TT table and a television set. Our batch was the first in the hostel, and about ninety students and six or seven teachers stayed at the hostel. I suspect two thirds of us had never played. We had plenty of opportunity and I learnt to play. Several times a week I played with several classmates, and occasionally a teacher (I remember Mr Ravichandran, our chemistry teacher as the one who played most often). By the time I finished college, I was perhaps in the top ten percent among hostelites. I developed quite a few shots, learnt to spin and drop, and was moderately good at returning serves. The tendency for glorious smashes and spectacular spins was my weakness, which better players would beat. Several years later, the SQL Server team I worked in also got a TT table. I could never beat two guys, Amrish Kumar  and Sam Hakim, a Lebanese colleague, but I beat everyone else at least in one game upto 21 points. I was evenly matched with several guys, sometimes I won, sometimes I lost. I played only for pleasure, and as a break during work, so I was fine with that.

I haven't played TT in nearly twenty years now.

A photo from my days in College station, Texas

In between Krishnankovil and Seattle, I lived three years in Texas. In a small college town – twin towns actually, called Bryan and College Station. One of our neighbors was an Indian family, and the father, Michael invited me and any interested friends to a recreation room in a church that he attended, for games of table tennis and billiards or snooker, in the evenings. He taught me snooker and billiards, and we played a few games.  Some university students from China also frequented the place, and we occasionally played with them also. Most of them were at my level, though one or two were really good. Having seen Chinese guys on television play utterly awesome TT in Asiad games and the Olympics, I was pleasantly surprised that some were only at my level.

I casually mentioned this church recreation room to a friend from Coimbatore, Ramesh – we both attended an AI class the first semester; and he said he would love to come. So we went together a few times. And I played against him. The rallies were simple. The strange thing was that unlike every other player, he never tried anything fancy. No spectacular smashes or brilliant drop shots, or complicated spins on the ball. I guessed he too had learnt to play in college, but was conservative. After a few rallies we played some games. With no spectacular moves at all he took every set, never allowing me to cross fifteen points, before he got to twenty one. I didn’t think much of it; just some bad shots I played – I gave him his victories. And anyway it was all for fun.

Then we went there a couple of days later, and this time a couple of Chinese guys showed up. We mixed and matched and played, and while the rest of us won and lost a few games, Ramesh seemed to never lose a game. I was impressed. His conservative strategy really paid off. Next time I should try that.

Which I did. And he won again. By this time, he got under my skin, and I really wanted to win against him. So I decided to focus, concentrate and avoid rash shots. I could feel my game getting far better; I didn’t try silly or complex serves, and I didn’t gave away easy points but he still won. More confident, this time I tried some aggressive shots; and he returned several of them, impassively, unfluttered. The better I got, the more normal he stayed and still kept beating me. The only thing he ever tried was to put the ball on my side. No gimmicks. He returned even my excellent shots and brilliant spins.

Maybe he didn’t learn to play in college.

“Wow! You are excellent,” I said in admiration. “Utterly unflappable. Were you on your college team or something?” I asked. He gave a nonchalant shrug and a neutral smile. “Were you?” I persisted. He kind of gently nodded. “Wow! You played for college. No wonder I cant beat you. Did you play any tournaments against other colleges?” He gave another nonchalant shrug. “Come on, did you?” He nodded. “Did you win?” Another neutral smile. “Wow, awesome! How good were you?” He was now really being shy. I waited for an answer. “Did you make the university team?” I asked, suddenly wondering if he was that good. There were several dozen universities affiliated to Bharatiyar University, Coimbatore, including engineering colleges, besides arts and science colleges. It was one of the five big universities in Tamilnadu, each of which had more than a hundred colleges affiliated. Madurai Kamaraj University, to which my college AKCE was affiliated then, had nearly 180 affiliated colleges – which I knew because most of them competed in the Cultural Competitions every year, and I had participated in several of those. A university table tennis team would have five to ten players picked from among thousands of students from one of those colleges.

He finally dropped his mask. “I was captain,” he said. “Captain of what?”

“Captain of the university team.”

Boy, did I feel silly. How kind he was to let me get to fifteen points once in a while.

A few weeks later, we ran into a couple of new Chinese guys along with the regulars. And naturally played with them too. One of them really good, spectacular in fact, and he beat everyone of his Chinese friends comfortably.

Then I played against him.

Six points.

This was humiliation. Twenty one to six.

Wait, was this guy that good? I was not happy.

Next it was Ramesh’s turn, and I grinned to myself. Maybe this Chinese guy was a University player or something. Ramesh pretty much could beat every other Chinese player, so here was a fascinating contest. None of the others knew Ramesh was a former University captain, did they?

It was a nice contest, but Ramesh barely crossed ten points.  A couple of the Chinese guys grinned then went back to neutral expressions. I was impressed. But maybe it was a stroke of luck. But it was my turn again, against the new guy. I tried to bring full concentration, nothing silly, but quickly he was leading something like fifteen to three. Abandoning all caution, I tried a few spectacular shots. He just returned them casually, some even quite acrobatically. In fact, I too got in some spectacular returns because his placement were fantastic. A couple of the Chinese guys applauded my shots and returns too.

21 to 4.

Yeah four. Not even six points. Four.

This time I was too shocked to be humiliated. I don’t remember, but I think Ramesh played him again, and got beat again too. He just kept shaking his head in admiration after that.

I told Ramesh, maybe he is a university captain like you too. One of the Chinese guys overheard. He told us, “Don’t feel so bad.  He is a province champ.”

“What does that mean I asked? Province champ?”

“Henan province, in China. He won the state championship.”

Ramesh and I looked at each other and couldn’t help laughing. Wow, no wonder he was that good.

The Chinese guy nodded sagely. Then unleashed the final shot : “Just missed out making the Olympic team.”

Heh.

I once played table-tennis with an Olympic guy from China and scored six points against him. Cool, huh? 

(PS: It may not have been Henan province, but some other province of China. Still...)

Related links

The Sehwag difference

The art and  Aesthetic of Driving

Rabbit roars

Personal stories


Saturday, 7 May 2016

Renminbi as International Currency Reserve

Prof Jacob Kurien of Johns Hopkins University's Nanjing Center lectured on the prospects of the Chinese Renminbi or yuan, as an international reserve currency at MIDS, Adyar, on April 26, 2016. Here are some of the salient points from his lecture.

Among the  top global Banks, the four largest are Chinese banks.

China has Bilateral currency swap agreements with 35 countries. 3.3 trillion Renminbi trade is on the basis of these.

Dimsum international and Panda domestic bonds issued in Renminbi.

China is the largest trading nation!! They have established clearing houses for RMB and Offshore RMB deposit accounts.

Twenty provinces are authorized to settle trade payments using RMB. Use of RMB for trade settlement and international payments. (SWIFT fifth position). International institutional investors have expanded their role.

RMB remains the only major currency which is not fully convertible! Interest rate caps removed on deposit and lending. But they have limits with "foreign guidance".

Expanded free trade zones to new regions.

Management basket of 13 currencies which have been revealed, formerly secretive.

Deposit insurance scheme for small savers.

Ramifications

Internationalization must be in three stages : liberalization, regionalization then globalization

The financial sector is fragile.(Gopu's comment: Really? This seems to be the popular perception in the financial media, but I'm skeptical. They have plenty of money to play around with. Aren't they the world's second largest economy? Is their situation remotely comparable to USA in 2008? Or Greece or Venezuela now? Or Russia in 1998? I doubt it. )

Growing debt and NPAs. (Gopu's comment: Is that a problem or a feature of every economy now? Isn't India worse? Aren't several USA state governments subject to deep fiscal problems, especially debt?)

Corporate debt is largest globally (115% of GDP)

Over capacity in manufacturing
High debt / GDP ratio (282%)
Decline in foreign reserves
Capital outflows and wealth effects
Volatile exchange rate and stock markets
Economic slowdown and middle income trap.  
6.5% growth is the new normal.
Move from export driven to consumption driven

Conclusions
Road to internationalization long and arduous.
Renminbi displacing US dollar in near future is farfetched.

Related Posts

  1. Deng Xiaoping and Japan
  2. What is News? - China's Cement Story
  3. Lady and Gentlemen
  4. Roadmap to Renminbi Internationalization


Sunday, 15 November 2015

சீன பொருளாதார சீர்திருத்தம் – வழிகாட்டிய ஜப்பான்

டேனியல் யெர்கினும் ஜோசஃப் ஸ்டானிஸ்லாவும் எழுதிய The Commanding Heights எனும் நூலிலிருந்து இன்னுமோர் பகுதி. இதில், சீன கம்யூனிஸ்ட் கட்சித்தலைவர் மாவோ சேதுங்கின் ஆட்சிக்குப்பின், அதிபரான டெங்க் சாவோபிங்கின் ஆட்சியில், மாவோயிச பொது உடைமை கொள்கைகளை அவர் தகர்த்து மூலதன பொருளியல் கொள்கைகளை வரவேற்று நடத்திய சீர்திருத்தங்களை விவரிக்கிறார்கள்.

-----நூல் பகுதி ஆரம்பம்----

மாவோ அமல்செய்த பொது உடைமையின் விளைவுகள் ஏமாற்றம் தந்தன. அவரது முப்பது ஆண்டு ஆட்சியின் இறுதியில், சீன பொருளாதாரம் வளரவில்லை. சில இடங்களில் தேய்ந்தது.

மாவோ இறந்த பின், 1978ஆம் ஆண்டில் நாடே வரட்சியில் வாடியது. வற்றிப்போன மண்ணை ஏராலும் டிராக்டராலும் உழ முடியவில்லை. பஞ்சம் நாட்டை வாட்டியது. வயிற்றுப்போக்கு, என்சிஃபலாட்டீஸ், ஹெபடைடிஸ் என்று பல நோய்கள பறவி மக்களை வாட்டின. லட்ச கணக்கிள் பஞ்சம் பிழைக்க மக்கள் நாடோடி நகரம் தேடி அலைந்தனர். ஷாங்காய் நகரத்திற்குள் இந்த லட்சங்கள் வரமல் தடுக்க படைகள் திரண்டன. பஞ்சத்தின் காட்சிகளை படத்தில் பார்த்து, ஆளும் கட்சியின் செயற்குழு கண்ணீர் விட்டு கதரி அழுதனர்.

மிகக்கடுமையாக உழைத்து உழுதாலே பயிர் வளரும் நிலமை. தம் உழைப்பில் தலைவர்கள் வாழ்ந்து லாபம் பெறுவதை சீன உழவர்கள் விரும்பவில்லை. தங்களுக்கு லாபமின்றி உழைக்க மறுத்தனர். பழைய வழிமுறைகள் வேண்டும் என்று கோரினர். பொது உடைமையும் மாவோயிசமும் சட்டமானதற்கு முன், சீன தேசத்தில் நிலவிய வழிமுறைக்கு “குடும்ப பொறுப்பு” முறை என்று பெயர். அதன் படி விளைச்சலில் ஒரு பகுதியை அவர்களே வைத்துக்கொள்ளலாம், விற்று லாபம் பெரலாம். பஞ்சத்தின் கடுமையால் அரசு அதிகாரிகள் ஒத்துக்கொண்டனர். ஆயினும், தமக்கு ஏதாவது நிகழ்ந்தால் தம் பிள்ளைகளை மற்றவர் பேணி வளர்க்க சபதம் எடுக்கவேண்டும் என்று பல உழவர்கள் வலியுறுத்தினர். அவ்வாறே ஊர்கட்டுப்பாடாக உழவர் சமூகங்கள் சபதம் செய்தன.

[கோபுவின் வரலாற்று குறிப்பு ஏன் இந்த பயம்? 1960களில் மாவோ தற்காலிகமாக சர்வாதிகாரத்தை தளர்த்தி ஆயிரம் பூக்கள் மலரட்டும் என்று சுதந்திர சிந்தனைகளுக்கு இடம் கொடுத்தார். சில மாதங்கள் கொஞ்சம் கொஞ்சமாக சிலர் மனதில் உறுதி கொண்டு மார்க்ஸிஸத்திற்கும் மாவோயிஸத்திற்கும் மாற்றுக்கருத்துக்களை சொன்னார்கள். டெங்க் சாவோபிங் போன்ற கட்சி தளபதிகளும் இக்கருத்துக்களை உரைத்தனர். தன் சர்வாதிகாரத்திற்கு ஆபத்தை உணர்ந்த மாவோ, அவர்கள் அனைவரையும் புரட்சிக்கு துரோகிகள் என்று பழித்து, மாணவர்களிடம் பெரும் கிளர்ச்சியூட்டி, பெற்றோரை முதியோரையும் தாக்கும் வெறிச்செயலை தூண்டினார். பள்ளிகளும் கல்லூரிகளும் மூடப்பட்டு, ஆசிரியர்களும் எழுத்தாளரும் கிராமங்களுக்கு அனுப்பப்பட்டு பயிற்சியே இல்லாத உழவு மற்றும் பட்டரை வேலைகளை செய்ய கட்டாயப்படுத்தப்பட்டனர். இதை கலாச்சார புரட்சி என்று பெயரிட்டார் மாவோ. அந்த கசப்பான நினைவுகள் பல உழவர்களின் நினைவில் இருந்தது. இந்த அரசு தளர்த்தலும் அது போலாகிவிடுமா என்ற அச்சம் உழவர்களை வதைத்தது.]

நிற்க. சபதம் செய்த உழவர், தம் கடும் உழைப்பில் பஞ்சத்தை ஓரளவு தவிர்த்தனர். மாவோயிசத்தை நீக்கி, குடும்ப பொறுப்பு முறை சீனமெங்கும் அமலுக்கு வந்தது. முப்பது ஆண்டுகளில் மாவோயிசத்தில் வளர்ச்சி பெறாத வேளான்மை, குடும்ப பொறுப்பு முறையில், பதினாறு ஆண்டுகளில் ஐம்பது சதவிகித வளர்ச்சி கண்டது.
[ இந்தியாவில் இதற்குமுன் பசுமை புரட்சி பரவியது. சீனாவில் பசுமை புரட்சியின் தாக்கத்தை பற்றி நூலாசிரியர்கள் ஏதும் குறிப்பிடவில்லை ]

தாம் வளர்த்த பயிரை தாமே விற்கலாம் என்ற உரிமை கிடைத்தபின், அதாவது, சந்தை பொருளாதாரம் மீண்டும் அறிமுகமான பின், வணிகத்தின் பல தரவுகள் தானாக உருவாகின. உழவர்கள தாமாக மற்ற பணிகளை தொடங்கினர். வீடுகட்டுவதும், பழுது பார்ப்பதும், காய்கனி பயிரை சந்தைக்கு எடுத்துசெல்வதும், வேலைக்கு ஆள் சேர்ப்பதும் சகஜமாயின. 1978இல் விளைச்சலில் எட்டு சதவிகிதமே சந்தைகளில் விற்கப்பட்டன. 1990இல் இது எண்பது சதவிகிதமாக கூடின.

(1978இல்) ஜப்பானின் வளர்ச்சியை காணவும் அங்குள்ள திட்டங்களை புரிந்துகொள்ளவும் சில சீன பொருளியல் பண்டிதர்கள் சென்று, அந்நாட்டின் வளர்ச்சியும் செல்வமும் கண்டு அதிர்ந்தனர். கம்யூனிஸ்ட் கட்சியின் கொள்கை பரப்பு குழுத்தலைவர் குறித்துக்கொண்ட புள்ளிவிவரங்கள் - இரண்டில் ஒரு வீட்டில் கார் இருந்தது. 95% மேல் வீடுகளில் தொலைகாட்சி, ஃப்ரிட்ஜ், துணிதோய்க்கும் விசை இருந்தன. மக்கள ஆடைகளை கண்டே அசந்து போனார்; எத்தனை வகை ஆடைகள், எவ்வளவு சுத்தமாக இருந்தன! “நாம் பார்த்த பெண்களில் ஒருவரை போல் இன்னொருவரின் ஆடை இல்லை,” என்று எழுதினார். அதைவிட பெரிய அதிசயம் : “பெண்கள் தினமும் ஆடைகளை மாற்றிக்கொள்கின்றனர்”

-------நூல் பகுதி முற்றும்-------

கோபுவின் குறிப்பு

மாவோவின் சீனாவில், வெளிநாட்டு சினிமா, பத்திரிகை, தொலைகாட்சி எல்லாம் தடைப்பட்டிருந்தன. பாரதத்தில் நாம் ஹாலிவுட் சிங்கப்பூர் ஹாங்காங் படங்களை திரையரங்குகளில் பார்த்துவந்தோம். ஆனால் 1984இல் ராஜீவ காந்தி பிரதமர் ஆகும் வரை, “ஜனநாயகமான” இந்திய அரசுகள் தொலைகாட்சிகளை தடை செய்துவந்தன. சென்னை, கல்கட்டா, பம்பாய், தில்லி, நான்கு மாநகரங்களில் மட்டுமே கருப்பு வெள்ளை தொலைகாட்சி இருந்தது. 1960களில் அமெரிக்காவில் வந்த கலர் டிவியை, 1980களில் அனுமதித்து ராஜீவ் காந்தியின் நிதி அமைச்சர் விபி சிங் வானொலிக்கும் தொலைகாட்சிக்கும் அதுவரை கட்டாயமான லைசன்ஸை ரத்து செய்தார். நம்மால் அன்னாட்டு செல்வத்தை சினிமாவிலும் டிவியிலும் பார்க்க முடிந்தது. ஆனால் அவை பணக்கார நாடு இந்தியா ஏழை நாடு என்ற பிரச்சாரம் ஓயவேயில்லை.

இன்றைய யதார்த்த தேவைகளாக நினைக்கும் கேமரா, டேப் ரிக்கார்டர், ஃப்ரிட்ஜ், ஷேவிங் க்ரீம் போன்ற பொருள்களை வாங்க, அந்நாட்களில் அதிகம் வரிகளால் அதிக விலை கொடுத்தோ, இல்லை கடத்தல்காரர்களின் வணிகத்தையோ வள்ளல்குணத்தையோ நம்பி வாங்கவேண்டும்.

ஆனால் ஜனநாயக நாடாக இருந்ததால், மாவோவின் மாபெருந்தாவல், கலாச்சார புரட்சி போன்ற கொடுங்கோல் தீவினைகளில் நாம் சிக்கவில்லை. ஆடையும் தூய்மையும் நடுத்தரவர்கத்தினருக்கோ பல ஏழைகளுக்கோ கூட பெரும் பிரச்சனையில்லை. நேரு-இந்திரா முப்பத்தைந்து ஆண்டுகளில் சுமாரான ஆடைகளை வாங்கி வாழ்ந்து வந்தோம்.


The English version of this essay is here - Deng Xiaoping and Japan

தொடர்புடைய பதிவுகள்

Thursday, 29 October 2015

Deng Xiaoping and Japan

Another extract from Daniel Yergin and Joseph Stanislaw's book, The Commanding Heights. I will post a Tamil translation of this section soon. This part deals with the status of the Chinese economy, first under Mao Tse Tung, from 1949 to his death, and later, Deng's reforms beginning in 1978.

---------Start of Extract----------------

Mao's collectivization produced dismal results. Outputs in many regions was no greater than it had been three decades earlier, and in some places, actually less.

China's entire economic reform began with severe drought in 1978. The ground was so dry neither tractors nor plows could break it. Starvation became endemic. Dysentery encephalitis hepatitis and other diseases swept through the region. Hundreds of thousands fled their homes, a militia mobilized to prevent them flooding into shanghai. A film of the suffering to made Politburo members cry out, cover faces and weep. Peasants would not do hardest labour until they could benefit. They pleaded for a return to the old ways. By this they mean the household responsibility system, which allowed a family to keep some of the benefits of their labor. Even so, some of the peasants insisted upon swearing a common  oath to take care of each other's children  if they should "come to grief" by being arrested for participating in such a new program. Their fears were based on what happened during the Cultural Revolution.

But the experiment was successful. The responsibility system was adopted throughout China replacing Maoism. Over sixteen years output increased more than 50%.

The introduction of markets generated an entire trading apparatus.  Farmers involved themselves in transportation, house building, repair, private food markets, and hiring workers. In 1978, just 8% of agricultural output was sold in the open market. By 1990, the share was 80%.

Visiting Japan and seeing it's dynamism first hand shocked the Chinese economists. The head of Communist party propaganda division noticed : one out of two households in Japan owned a car; more than 95% possessed TV, fridges and washing machines. He was overwhelmed by how the people were dressed - by the variety of clothing and it's cleanliness. "on the street, of all the women we saw, no two wore the same style of clothes." Even more astonishing : "Female workers who accompanied us changed clothes every day."

---------End of Extract---------------

Gopu's Note

In China under Mao, foreign movies, magazines and television were rare. In India, we could see Hollywood movies, or those set in Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan etc., even though television was stifled by all Central Governments before Rajiv Gandhi became Prime Minister in 1984. Rajiv ushered in the color television age, and his finance minister VP Singh cancelled all licenses for radios and television sets. So we could see those people enjoying the advantages of the free market, but it was dinned into most Indians that foreigners were rich and India was a poor country.

People who wanted to enjoy any consumer goods like fridges, cameras, tape recorders, shaving gel, etc had to pay high prices (as these were luxury goods) or depend on the kindness and public service of smugglers.

But we were never subject to the insanity and horrors of the Great Leap Forward or the Cultural Revolution. And clothing and cleanliness were not problems for the middle classes, or even most of the poor. People just bought fewer clothes of poorer quality in those Nehruvian decades.

Related Posts

Mario Varghas Llosa and Gabriel Garcia Marquez - A Lack of Economic Knowledge

Wednesday, 25 February 2015

What is News?

When I first read Tom Friedman’s book “The Lexus and the Olive tree” in 1999, I was stunned. It related a set of major and historical events in the 1980s and 1990s of which I was unaware, either totally, or tangentially. I was an avid reader of newspapers and somewhat less avid consumer of television news : or so I thought. Apparently I was reading the wrong news, mostly politics, sports, entertainment or science.

TV news, I realise, is just radio with makeup. It’s practically disinformation, not news. Newspapers are hardly better. But clearly they serve some markets.

Sometimes, a single statistic or graph explains more things than a whole shelf of books or a decade of personal experience. Moore’s law, Julian Simon’s bet, the Laffer curve, linguistics maps in Jared Diamond’s book “Guns Germs and Steel”, all these explain a phenomenon, a principle or history in a way that words simply can’t. This one, on plants and animals, stunned me recently.

John Allen Paulos tries to make this point in his book A Mathematician Reads the Newspaper. I think he fails by politeness. Hans Rosling does a better job with his TED talks.

Vaclav Smil, by dealing with large significant numbers, and placing them in context is unparalleled in the small circle that I am aware of. Bill Gates, who recently endorsed Smil as the author whose book he looks forward to the most, tweets some graphs, which I find are far more newsworthy than a hundred headlines about so-called earth shattering events. In an essay that explains how the world uses 20th century materials, Gates explains Smil's book Making the Modern World, with excellent graphs.

This one on China and cement is one such. China has used more cement in the last three years 2011-13 than the United States did in the 20th century. That simply stuns me.



This graph on the benefits of vaccination in the US, is an example of a bad graph, much harder to understand. 

If only journalists would explain national budgets, industrialization, the market economy, science, or other political issues with such graphs. They only analyze - overanalzye - elections and electorate behaviour on such a scale. This is not confined to Indian media, it is a world wide phenomenon. The only channels where you see informative graphs are the sports channels : cricket, basketball, American football, tennis, these sports are analyzed with excellent statistics and very enlightening graphs. Perhaps that level of arithmetic is beyond the capacity of journalism. I doubt it. I suspect that their primary function is to misinform and keep the noise level high.

Related Posts

2. எடிசனின் வால்மீகி - வஷ்லவ் ஸ்மில்
3. A Fascinating Graph of Life
4. The Laffer Curve

Followup March 28, 2015

Vaclav Smil's graph on cement and China was irresistible to Bill Gates. After a few weeks, Gates' tweet became irresistible to a major newspaper - the Washington Post, which published a story on the graph - though only a blog. I don't know if it came out in the print edition.

Saturday, 8 February 2014

Chennai? China? Madras? Madrassa?

As part of Tamil Heritage Trust's fifth site seminar, I was one of 30 people who visited several sites in Gujarat recently. "Where are you from?" was a common question. At Sarkhej Roza mosque in Ahmedabad, a young boy asked this question. When my friend VSS Iyer replied "Chennai?", he asked "China?" "No, no, Chennai," his mother laughed "remember the Shah Rukh Khan movie Chennai express?" The boy only nodded vaguely.

At another place, an automobile museum on the outskirts of Ahmedabad, I was asked the same question. Not a boy, 25 years old, in a white uniform, in charge of showing the cars to the visitors. "Madras," I said. "Madrassa?" he asked - a madrassa is a Muslim school, often held in a mosque. "No, Chennai." No recognition. "Shah Rukh Khan, Chennai express?" I added, using a mother's trick. Continued cluelessness.

I said "Jayalalitha, Karunanidhi." No response. "Chennai Superkings? Dhoni?" Blank look. "Tamil Nadu?" Shake of the head. "Kanyakumari, Ramesvaram?" I asked in despair. Very slight nod, "Sunaa," he said, meaning "I think I have heard of those places."

He did not even know Rajini Kanth.

I must say, every other person who ever asked, even those who may have been illiterate, immediately recognized Chennai or Madras.

Mulla Mohammad ali Madrasvala

Almost as a counterpoint, we visited the house of a Bohra Muslim called Mulla Mohammadali Madrasvala in Siddhpur. His descendants -who live in Kotturpuram!- hosted us and let us roam about the place. He is called Madrasvala because in his time he spent most of his money in Madras/Chennai. Sidhdhpur is to Bohra muslims what Karaikkudi is to Chettinadu Nagaraththaars. Mr Taheri Danalivala, who gave us a presentation on Siddhpur and Bohra Muslims, and who himself is now a resident of Chennai, says that when he is called Madrasvala in Gujarat!

Friday, 3 January 2014

An End to Chinese Cruelty

A great cruelty was recently reversed! Or ended partially. China ended its One Child totalitarianism two days back. A tremendous leap forward in human rights. Whole generations have grown up with no aunts or uncles or brothers or sisters. Now that is set to change. 

I wonder why it has been met with no celebration at all. Why this deafening silence? I think the fear of Malthusian "overpopulation" has not abated. As Matt Ridley observes, the human race is the only one that gets more prosperous as we get more populous. Our population is our strength, he avers. As the economist Julian Simon has observed, most things become cheaper as technology, markets and human progress make their impact felt.

I think the cacophony of newspapers, artists, politicians, religious organizations, aid activists and philanthropists - both super rich and otherwise, who have  a strong vested interest in perennially complaining that the world is poor, are primarily to blame. The strong myth that the "Rich are getting richer, and the poor are getting poorer" in spite of all the evidence to the contrary, is primarily driving it. 


The phrase "demographic dividend" has worked wonders, as has the clear realization that in 20 years, several billion have dramatically improved their prosperity, education, health, and happiness.

2014 has had a wonderful begining. Let us hope it continues.